Wednesday 3 October 2007

Is there any buzz about PDF?

This blog may have a range of views on it eventually. This is just my response to what I think is happening at MAX.

The PDF world has more or less vanished from Chicago so far as I can tell. MAX has always been a Macromedia event but now appears to be Adobe wide. I have written for the WWWatford site about MAX being a continuation of Macromedia and Adobe Classic being a term for what was Adobe, including the mysterious business unit for print and classic publishing. They may have their own marketing budget but if so they are spending it very carefully.

Collaboration has always been possible through PDF if enough people have access to the software. Somehow Adobe marketing vision seems to have segmented the PDF fans into a cash cow area and projected the Flash audience into a star future.

LiveCycle so far has been frighteningly expensive. It has only been promoted to a small group of large financial organisations and government departments.

PC World reports from MAX

"People are using Web-based content to collaborate in real time," Lynch said. "We have great experience with this, with client technology like Flash. We hope to deploy this collaboration in a way that will work for everyone."

Lynch said Adobe is leveraging its dual strength in providing Web technologies, such as Flash, and software such as Adobe Acrobat for sharing and collaborating on desktop documents, to compete in this market. With Adobe's Web technologies and hosted services, companies generally don't have to install new client or server software to collaborate, another thing that differentiates Adobe from Microsoft and IBM, he said.

Ron Schmelzer, [cq] senior analyst at research firm Zapthink LLC, said Adobe is still trying to figure out its business model around its collaboration services. But it has a great opportunity to create a new way for workers to collaborate that extends what competitors are doing.

"They're not trying to reproduce the word processor. They're trying to create a new model that changes the whole concept of sharing documents and collaborating with other people online," he said. "This market is theirs to capture."


Well, ok, but the PDF approach so far has been that companies have to install a lot of very expensive software on both client and server. The Acrobat Reader has long contained many features that are kept turned off until the server sends a suitable message. Maybe this was just part of a previous model. Macromedia Contribute was priced at a seat level such that it was not an option for most sites.

LiveCycle seems to be moving in a direction where both Flash and PDF will be included. It remains to be seen how affordable it will be. Perhaps collaboration will be possible through a range of business models.

Introducing Exetreme.com the blog

Exetreme is a web design company based in Exeter, South West England. We have done sites previously combining Dreamweaver and PDF. This blog is partly to explore what is possible as a transition appears to be happening from a web based on text to a web that concentrates on video.

Adobe supply most of the software we use for design. From the current MAX event in Chicago it is clear that they see a future around Flash.

We continue to work closely with Psand for website hosting and technical service. Gradually their advocacy for open source is getting to us. As patented software moves towards video it is possible that open source is capable of meeting the requirements of a text web, including PDF.

We have worked with Psand and Acrobat Services on a proposal to eTEN on a research project. Psand have shown that bandwidth is possible using satellites and wifi. Interest continues in how people learn from PDF and the role of server software. The scope is now wider than PDF. The project continues and any feedback is welcome. Exetreme will offer services connected with the research.

For the text web we can suggest open source solutions but can also work with more expensive options if required. We will look at the new "rich internet" experiences but cannot claim familiarity until clients are interested.